Jerome Kym vs Emil Ruusuvuori Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Ruusuvuori has secured 41.45% of points on his second serve, whereas Kym leads slightly with 42.16%. This particular statistic is a strong indicator of potential match outcomes. Does the marginal lead give Kym a notable advantage? It suggests a minor edge.
• Return Game Stats: When it comes to returning, Ruusuvuori dominates with a 50.64% success rate on opponents' second serves, compared to Kym’s 45.8%. This indicates Ruusuvuori has a stronger return game.
• First Serve Returns: Ruusuvuori again edges out slightly at 26% versus Kym's 24.49%, hinting at his slight edge in returning skills.
• Under Pressure Performance: Ruusuvuori shows resilience under pressure by saving 63.71% of breakpoints, outperforming Kym’s 57.52%. Ruusuvuori could therefore handle critical moments better.
• Match Winning Stats: Over the past year, Ruusuvuori has won 46.15% of matches, while Kym stands out with a higher 67.65% win rate. This suggests Kym has been more consistent in securing victories.
• Surface Performance: Ruusuvuori excels on indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate, whereas Kym performs best on hard courts with a 74% win rate. The specific surface may thus determine their strength.
• Competitive Level: Ruusuvuori has faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank 171.31) compared to Kym’s opponents (average rank 266.03), showing Ruusuvuori's experience against tougher competition.
• Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Ruusuvuori has a 75% success rate, which is significantly stronger than Kym’s 44%. This could be a critical factor.
• Break Point Conversion: Both players show comparable break point conversion rates, with Ruusuvuori at 33.33% and Kym closely behind at 31.48%, indicating no substantial difference here.

Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match promises to be a closely contested battle between Ruusuvuori and Kym, with each player showcasing distinct strengths that could influence the outcome.

Kym's marginal edge in second serve performance and his overall win percentage over the past year suggests strong form. His superior performance on hard courts could be a determining factor, especially given the surface of the match.

Conversely, Ruusuvuori exhibits a solid return game and proficiency in high-pressure scenarios, notably in saving breakpoints. His competitive edge is further highlighted by struggling against higher-ranked players, which may prepare him better for tougher opponents.

While Kym has demonstrated greater consistency in winning matches, Ruusuvuori's ability to perform well in deciding sets offers a potential advantage should the match extend.

Based on these analyses, Kym seems more likely to secure the win, though Ruusuvuori certainly has the tools to create an upset if the match dynamics favor his strengths.